A frank discussion about how to create positive changes in the world of kids’ sport
In January, my e-mail and social media accounts lit up with a simple image first shared with me on Twitter by @ohiovarsity.
It’s amazing because the image portrays something that is widely known among experts, widely discussed in coaching circles, and has certainly been written about by me and others many times. Yet this excellent blog article on a high school sports site got over half a million shares in its first three days because this image touched a nerve.
Why? Well, here is the image:
Guest post by John O’Sullivan
John founded the Changing the Game Project in 2012, which promotes a child-centred approach to youth sport. The author of the book, Changing the Game, John is a training centre director for the Major League Soccer Portland Timbers. Follow John on Twitter, Facebook, or read more at his blog.
The question I was asked over and over was, “What do you think of this?” My answer, over and over was, “Amen, agreed, hopefully now people will start paying attention.”
If it takes an infographic of [football head coach] Urban Meyer’s football recruits at Ohio State [the Buckeyes won the first ever College Football Playoff National Championship in January] to shift the paradigm in youth sports, then so be it. The image above clearly demonstrates that the overwhelming majority of his recruits are multi-sport kids.
This is not new information, but it has caused quite a stir. Here is what it says in a nutshell: To be an elite level player at a college or professional sport, you need a degree of exceptional athleticism. And the best medically, scientifically, and psychologically recommended way to develop such all around athleticism is ample free play and multiple sport participation as a child.
Why? Well let’s see what the experts say:
Coaches and elite athletes
Pete Carroll, former USC and now Seattle Seahawks Football coach, says here, “The first questions I’ll ask about a kid are, ‘What other sports does he play? What does he do? What are his positions? Is he a big hitter in baseball? Is he a pitcher? Does he play hoops?’ All of those things are important to me. I hate that kids don’t play three sports in high school. I think that they should play year-round and get every bit of it that they can through that experience. I really, really don’t favor kids having to specialize in one sport. Even [at USC], I want to be the biggest proponent for two-sport athletes on the college level. I want guys that are so special athletically, and so competitive, that they can compete in more than one sport.”
Dom Starsia, University of Virginia men’s lacrosse: “My trick question to young campers is always, ‘How do you learn the concepts of team offense in lacrosse or team defense in lacrosse in the off-season, when you’re not playing with your team?’ The answer is by playing basketball, by playing hockey and by playing soccer and those other team games, because many of those principles are exactly the same. Probably 95 percent [of our players] are multi-sport athletes. It’s always a bit strange to me if somebody is not playing other sports in high school.”
Or in this interview with Tim Corbin, coach of NCAA Champion Vanderbilt Baseball, on why he chooses multi-sport athletes over single sport kids.
Or Ashton Eaton, world record holder and gold medalist in the decathlon, who never participated in 6 of the 10 required decathlon events until he got to the University of Oregon.
Or Steve Nash, who got his first basketball at age 13 and credits his soccer background for making him a great basketball player, a similar story to the 100 professional athletes interviewed in Ethan Skolnick and Dr. Andrea Korn’s book, Raising Your Game. The list goes on and on.
What about the medical experts?
As I outlined in my ebook, Is it Wise to Specialize?, and something echoed in world renowned orthopedic surgeon James Andrew’s book, Any Given Monday, there are strong medical reasons for not specializing at a young age:
- Children who specialize in a single sport account for 50 percent of overuse injuries in young athletes according to pediatric orthopedic specialists.
- A study by Ohio State University found that children who specialized early in a single sport led to higher rates of adult physical inactivity. Those who commit to one sport at a young age are often the first to quit, and suffer a lifetime of consequences.
- In a study of 1,200 youth athletes, Dr Neeru Jayanthi of Loyola University found that early specialization in a single sport is one of the strongest predictors of injury. Athletes in the study who specialized were 70 to 93 percent more likely to be injured than children who played multiple sports.
- Children who specialize early are at a far greater risk for burnout due to stress, decreased motivation, and lack of enjoyment
- Early sport specialization in female adolescents is associated with increased risk of anterior knee pain disorders including PFP, Osgood Schlatter and Sinding Larsen-Johansson compared to multi-sport athletes, and may lead to higher rates of future ACL tears.
And the sport scientists?
In January 2015, I had the honor of sitting in a lecture with Manchester United Performance Coach Tony Strudwick, winner of 13 titles as the fitness coach for Manchester United’s first team. His advice was that a multi-sport background sets up athletes for long-term success by lowering the rates of injuries and making them more adaptable to the demands of elite level play.
“More often than not,” he stated in a recent interview with SoccerWire.com, “the best athletes in the world are able to distinguish themselves from the pack thanks to a range of motor skills beyond what is typically expected in a given sport.” He recommended tumbling and gymnastic movements, as well as martial arts, basketball, and lacrosse as great crossover sports for soccer. Here are some other advantages:
- Better overall skills and ability: Research shows that early participation in multiple sports leads to better overall motor and athletic development, longer playing careers, increased ability to transfer sports skills to other sports, as well as increased motivation, ownership of the sports experience, and confidence.
- Smarter, more creative players: multi-sport participation at the youngest ages yields better decision making and pattern recognition, as well as increased creativity. These are all qualities that coaches of high-level teams look for.
- Most College Athletes Come From a multi-sport Background: A 2013 American Medical Society for Sports Medicine survey found that 88 percent of college athletes surveyed participated in more than one sport as a child
- 10,000 hours is not a rule: In his survey of the scientific literature regarding sport specific practice in The Sports Gene, author David Epstein finds that most elite competitors require far less than 10,000 hours of deliberate practice. Specifically, studies have shown that basketball (4,000), field hockey (4,000) and wrestling (6,000) all require far less than 10,000 hours.
- There are many paths to mastery: A 2003 study on professional ice hockey players found that while most pros had spent 10,000 hours or more involved in sports prior to age 20, only 3,000 of those hours were involved in hockey-specific deliberate practice (and only 450 of those hours were prior to age 12).
Are all sports the same?
No, they are not. They each require specific athletic, technical, and tactical skill sets. Some sports, in order to be elite, require early specialization, such as gymnastics and figure skating. Other sports are so dependent upon physical prowess (American football, basketball, volleyball, rugby, and others) that the technical skills and tactical know-how can be developed later. There are many stories of athletes taking up these sports in their teens, even in their 20s, and playing at a very high level because of the ability to transfer skills learned in one sport to another.
And then there are sports like hockey and soccer, which without a doubt require an early introduction to the sport. There are technical movements and skills that are most sensitive to improvement prior to a child’s growth spurt, and it is unlikely that a post-pubescent child is able to catch up if that is their first introduction to the sport.
However, there is no evidence that pre-teen athletes in these sports should only play a single sport. As both the hockey evidence and the interview with Tony Strudwick mentioned above demonstrate, playing multiple sports early on sets these athletes up for longer-term success. They can better meet the demands of elite level play. They are less likely to get injured or burnout, and more likely to persist through the struggles needed to become a high-level performer.
If you want your child to play at a high-level, then the best thing you can do is help them find a sport that best suits their abilities, and help create an environment that gives them the best chance of success. That environment is a multi-sport one.
The evidence is in. It’s pretty conclusive. It’s time for our youth sports organizations to not only allow but encourage multi-sport participation. Yes, it’s tough on the bottom line. But ask yourself this: Is your bottom line worth more than the well-being of the children you have been entrusted with educating?
So what do you think? Should kids play multiple sports? Only one? If you think specialization is the right path prior to the teenage growth spurt (excluding gymnastics and figure skating), then by all means bring some evidence and links to the discussion. And if not, then how about some thoughts on how we can stand up and change the status quo that forces kids to choose far too young.
Thanks to Urban Meyer and the poignant image of his recruiting class breakdown, we now have the opportunity to have this discussion. We have the opportunity to serve our children better. We have the responsibility to help them become better athletes by encouraging them to become all-around athletes. And we can do this by letting them play multiple sports. Let the discussion begin.
58 responses to “Can you guess the one thing that most elite athletes have in common?”
I find this article incredibly accurate even years after its release.
I can perhaps add to the discussion as an elite swimmer who was picked up by a professional club at 11 after swimming with a squad since I was 8. By the age of 12 I was training 5 days a week, by 13 training multiple times a day in the pool (2 hours per session) and doing gym, by 14 training twice a day every day except for Sunday and by 15 was a state champion in 100m and 200m butterfly.
My body is completely destroyed. I am 25 now, have had 5 knee surgeries and 2 shoulder reconstructions, 1 has failed and so looking at a latarjet procedure. Both my ortho surgeons and physio’s I’ve been seeing since my first dislocation at age 18 attribute the injuries to laxity and wastage of joints caused by overuse and overtraining as a child.
I wish I had played other sports. I was athletic in most fields due to fitness, but had no life after swimming. I had no other hobbies, no other interests and struggled when I was unable to swim competitively due to injury. I burnt out, was in pain, and my whole life revolved around the sport. Being unable to swim, I saw myself as a ‘loser’ and a ‘failure’ because I’d been raised as a win at all cost mentality. Any parents reading this – please make sure there are other activities outside of the one sport!!! The depression and lasting physical and emotional issues are still something I’m dealing with 8 years after stopping.
You should try out other sports now. Things like hiking, rock scrambling or water sports like paddle-boarding, e-foiling. You will find happiness in any activity you do outside. I suffered career ending knee injury and quit on my soccer dreams. Now I teach soccer drills and play soccer tennis to avoid further complications. I laugh and smile way more in soccer tennis vs an avg soccer match
Thank you for sharing this story. It helps parents who have very competitive kids to hear about the impacts specialization has had on you both physically and mentally.
Damm im an adult and i chose figure skating
As a kid who only truly loved Baseball, I hate this argument.
I would have killed for the opportunity to play baseball more than just during the spring/summer and given up those other activities that were really just because baseball wasn’t a thing off season, Let’s not always classify the one sport player as someone who has an overzealous parent or needs a balance of experiences.
There is a huge difference in being a baseball player who is athletic and an Athletic kid who plays baseball. Playing multiple sports does not in itself make you any more athletic than someone who plays one, so it seems this argument is more perception than reality. Or could it be a self fulfilling variable in a poorly executed study. One should I guess go and sign up for 3 sports and stink at 2 of them, but hey, more athletic. I highly believe that baseball is one of the sports where Athleticism is not the key element of the game, it merely helps if you know what you are doing to begin with (have the skill). You can have a gawky kid trip over himself 3 times on the way out to the mound and blow everyone away or constantly hit with runners on but maybe not turn everything infield ground ball into a single, And since when does playing multiple sports make you more competitive or have a higher drive than the kid who plays one sport? That is a potential indicator, but does not disprove drive or competitiveness in a one sport guy. Some coaches have an over inflated opinion of themselves where they think, “he can’t hit for beans but he’s a great athlete, I can teach him to hit”. Ah, no you can’t. You don’t have time. If he’s huge and runs fast, but can’t hit, and hasn’t learned to by now, he’s not going to, not in the time you need to prove he deserves to be there. I do believe this is an argument that doesn’t stand up, and might just be the musing of the person who didn’t have these opportunities in their day,,, or maybe the coach who thinks just give me an athlete, I god of coaches, will make him a great player. I think if you are a college coach, you take the polished player and if you still find the need to say they are a “Raw Talent” to CYA your decision, state it on them needing to add size and strength, not skill. Because as a coach, that is something you can control.
Hi , David
I think that you are missing the point.
The point being that the more skills anyone has (yes I am aware we are speaking sports here) but you take even a non sporty kid , say he loves science. You take that kid give him enough skills so that he can even play a decent game of baseball, football, swimming, etc. and that kid is going to be better at everything he does. Including his favorite Science.
The reason being. that kid will have much more people experience (which translates into life experience) so he is going to be smarter and he will have tons more confidence in anything he does. Confidence is the key to everything. A winning football player just might truly love baseball better. But if his confidence level is higher for football he will be better at football.
I would love to see some real research into this because for now it is my personal theory.
To have research with one child ….and pick one who likes sports, and have him play football or anything with “ringers ” for a season , but the ringers let him be the best , they are so good they can challenge him and make him play his best and they let him win . ok you take another kid do the same and his ringers challenge him and make him really get better , they get this kid to truly get good but they never let him win even though he comes close.
My theory is this , the kid that became good and always won will keep on being a winning player , because he has that confidence. He has the inner knowledge “i am really good , in training nobody could beat me and they were good.” and he will play better than the kid who could play better but never won. That kid will have the mindset , “yeah I thought i was good but I couldn’t beat any of the kids I played with , no matter how hard I tried. Up against that other kid who never lost I don’t have a chance no matter how good i am . ”
Do you see what I am getting at?
OK , that is dif from what they are saying here BUT it ties right in as well. It is the multi talented kid that will do better . People skills are critical . If a kid is good and has confidence , you can see it . His teammates can see it and will give him many more chances than the kid who is actually better but has no confidence . He is as easily read as the confident child . He will get no help from the teammates , (and that is crucial to making a good player a winning fantastic player) That is what it is all about …it is the whole package David. Not just how good the kid is at the sport. It takes knowledge , the more the better , because he gains know how and confidence with each one , even the losing kid , but he wont know it himself and that is what he needs the most to get others to have confidence in him and that feeds off of each other. Also the experiences he will have physically and mentally , it will all go into whatever it is he chooses to do . I also feel these cannot be done . Because I believe even if the kids are told afterward what was done the one that was a loser will not be able to shake that. It will haunt him for his life even when he learns dif because that is how a Childs mind works , so it can never be done in reality. But it doesn’t have to be i know this is true. But then It is my theory .
I hope in my partial to my way , have still brought you to a better understanding of what they are saying here. Because there are many ways to being a winning player , and nobody does it alone.
I have been a proponent of multiple sports for years now. I can see why early introduction to ice hockey, soccer and lacrosse is important because their particular skill sets are more easily learned and adapted at younger ages, but the athlete should be playing other sports too. Psychologically it is good for athletes to play different sports because they will find themselves at different skill levels and will learn from failure and frustration. Unfortunately, I coach in Florida. We have overlapping seasons and it is impossible to be a three season athlete. Football is a year round obsession with the HS coaches and I have never seen a football player playing basketball or a basketball player playing baseball or lacrosse. In all cases, an athlete is very late for the next season (football player misses at least six to ten basketball games by the time his fall season is over, for example). I had a basketball player who played lacrosse (my sport) who was a great lacrosse player but always missed at least six games out of a fifteen game schedule. This is unfair to any athlete. Florida still has spring football practices and that pushes back all sports on top of each other.
Mike- Wondering why you think lacrosse is best developed at a younger age. Plenty of professional lax players picked it up later. Thanks
In my opinion, this focus on children specializing early comes primarily from the fact that kids sports have gone from being non-organized recreational activities that kids did on their own with little to no supervision until high school to industries looking to make money off of little kids and their parents. 20-30 or more years ago, kids did whatever activity the weather outside permitted. If you lived where it snowed you skated on ponds or adults flooded back yards and/or parks and anyone who could get their hands on a pair of skates and a stick went and played hockey or figure skated. When it got warmer, kids would toss and/or kick balls back and forth in backyards, vacant lots, quiet streets & parks. Or biked back and forth popping wheelies or heading to the corner store. If there was enough space kids created their own baseball diamond or goalposts and the game was on with whoever showed up. Inner city kids would more likely have concrete parking lots and a hoop, so basketball proliferated. All participation required was minimal equipment and a few other kids. They didn’t even have to be friends. Just a body and a willingness to participate were all it took (that and the fact that your mom didn’t want you in the house bothering her until dinnertime). Nowadays, parents are over-scheduled and so are the kids. Kids in many places are not allowed to remain unsupervised for almost anytime, and so kids are placed early in organized activities to promote socialization and team building. Then come the clinics. Do this clinic and gain a competitive advantage for team selection when its time to sign-up for the next year. House teams versus rep teams starting earlier and earlier, and making the cut versus being cut. Give your kid a competitive advantage and sign-up for hockey clinics in the summer and/or futsal in the winter. Any activity can now be done year round and heaven knows these facilities have to justify their expense and the people and companies in the industry need to find year round gainful employment & income. That and the increasing fear that one’s kids need to be given every competitive advantage to survive in the future economy where gig jobs are becoming the norm and an assured middle-class income & affordable house are increasingly not a given. It’s a self-perpetuating endless loop.
But, that’s just my opinion.
This poster gets it! Ask, “to what end” and in parallel, look at the statistics. Also, I think people could stop to smell the roses once in a while and consider what it took for them to ‘survive’ or make it where they are currently. I think failing and testing limits teaches well, as does having to support your own habits or hobbies. Video games, just like not being allowed to come inside (until mom says) and playing whatever sport/activity you could, are what shapes us. I’m trying to envision what the tomorrow culture looks like..I’m sure my dad and grandparents did the same! I’m guessing it was not a great outlook ;)
Everything you talk about is true, but you are talking about a world 30-40 years ago.
That’s completely irrelevant today. Reality is sports is big business. Our world today is all about specialization, not just in sports but in the career fields as well. Try getting a job that pays the bills being a generalist. Try getting 3-4 part times jobs as see how that works for ya. Robotics, technology, dentistry, medical specialists and we could go on forever.
Yes I make my living working with hockey players. It’s highly specialized. Aimed at young elite players. Only the best work with me. I do ask my players to play other sports and many do but they can only dabble in it.
Becoming an elite player doesn’t allow for anything else other than 100% dedication.
The skating aspect is a 10-15 year commitment to just get to the junior levels beginning at age 16. And most continue to hire professionals to continue working on their skating for the entire duration of their playing career. It’s just the reality of today’s athletics. You multi-spirt hard from 5-6 until about 14 at the latest. Then it’s full on hockey.
Unless your child is going PROFESSIONAL, (1.5% of the population goes to college level, and less than 0.2% go to the pro’s.) than YOUR child doesn’t need to play 1 sport OR multi-sport. There are physical activities that doesn’t require teams or scheduled play like biking, hiking, swimming, school games, summer camp field games (to name a few). Also, repetitive injuries occur because of overuse, multi sport prevents this, BUT who has time or $$ to invest in multi sports? What programs allow for children to play RECREATIONALLY beyond age 5 or 6 anyways? We are a family of 4 athletic kids who play spring break soccer camp, summer break basketball camp, biking with the family, hiking on the weekends, swimming lessons so we can swim at the lake in the summer. I prefer an active lifestyle over a over-scheduled lifestyle as the chances of going professional is less than 1%.
I couldn’t agree more V. I also believe these lifestyle’s of control that is popular, is the reason, these same kids are coming back home or have never left. They have had zero time that was not made by themselves. It is as you say every second is scheduled. They are taught to not make decisions do what mommy tells you, go where daddy says, and that is it .There life style has taught them to do nothing until told to do it. Sadly it also has to be something they already know. They are unable to initiate. and it is not their fault . They need to be re-raised. In a way that will point them in the right direction and force them to learn life and how to live on their own, and not do to them what has been done which is ,literally render them useless. Even the ones that have “made” it, are doing robotic work. There is not much of anything original nor has there been for some time.
In my opinion, young children should have the chance to experience all sports before they pick a certain one to experience with a little more. They absolutely should not be forced into a sport that they are not certain they are going to be playing throughout their whole childhood. Kids should be able to play as many sports as they want whether they be playing a high level or not. They should have the experience with every sport until they have to pick a route to take while playing in university or college. Kids are often forced by their parents to pick one sport because of financial problems that they could be having. These kids are limited to the amount of sports they can play each year meaning they can’t explore all of the sports that are out there. I feel it is necessary to let the kids choose what sport they would like to pursue in. If kids are forced into a sport they would get sick of it when they grow older and it becomes more competitive and takes up more time in their life. Children struggle to participate in more than one sporting event when they’re older because you tend to be more active when you get older and therefore play more games causing them to struggle with other activities outside of sports. By playing a variety of sports when you are younger, you tend to be more active as an adult thus living a healthier lifestyle and increasing your life expectancy.
What an intriguing article! It’s interesting that there’s also medical and scientific backing to the argument, where a child is more likely to experience overuse injuries from only playing a single sport. However, the article didn’t seem to talk much about the child’s interest. What if a child is interested in specializing in a sport? Or is the article referring to parents forcing their children to specialize in a sport? The issue of specialization should be up to a child. A parent should not have the vision of “Oh my child will become a world-famous soccer player if they go to this academy!” but rather if a child wants to pursue a sport, then the parents should tell them about the work that must be put in (and that the work may not always be fun), and support them. Also, it seems like specialization is on a spectrum rather than discreetly on a basis of “you are” and “you aren’t.” Perhaps a kid wants to focus a bit more on one sport, but it doesn’t mean that they want to dedicate their lives to it. If someone is interested in gymnastics, sure it may require early specialization, but that does not mean that they can only do gymnastics, can only dedicate themselves to gymnastics. Maybe the child only does gymnastics recreationally, for fun. It still requires specialization, but it’s not the image of tiger parenting for 4 hours a night in a gym. More often than not, kids do not go on to make a career out of sports, but keep it as a hobby, so why not just allow the kid to enjoy the sport, why push and force the kid to become the best of the best? Like the article said, to have a child specialize in only one sport and push to train makes the sport no longer enjoyable. If a person loses their drive and motivation for the sport, was all that work and effort worth the outcome? Worth the time? Worth the loss of an enjoyable and memorable childhood?
Recruiting multi-sport athletes is great, and sure colleges are still recruiting single-sport athletes, but the world seems to favour those of many interests. This may be concerning for athletes who are still very passionate for their single sport, and train lots for that single sport to become very very good, but the multi-sport athletes are preferred. This starts to become an issue similar to how colleges are more likely to accept a person of colour with lower grades over an asian with high grades, otherwise known as affirmative action in the USA. This is made particularly clear in the eighth paragraph where they interviewed Pete Carroll, where Carroll asks potential recruits about other sports they play, and how he wants his college-level players to play at least two sports as well. Perhaps Carroll just wants a versatile and adaptable player, but would that make things tough for an applicant who has trained and dedicated all their life to a single sport, pouring their hearts into their soul passion?
The article also speaks of how during off season of a child/teen’s primary sport, they should be playing other sports to not just keep in shape but to also learn other transferable skills. This is a wonderful idea and keeps the child/teen involved, but again, it should be the decision of the child/teen. If they do not wish to play, it should be their decision. Of course parents should make them try it out and encourage them to keep going with it, but if after trying and they do not seem to enjoy it, they shouldn’t keep their kid in it just to say that they’re a multi-sport athlete.
Overall, just let the kid choose. If a kid wants to become a world-famous soccer player, guide them along the path to success, but if they don’t wish to continue, don’t force them! If they want to play recreationally, allow them that choice. It’s their life.
I couldn’t agree more. This is where we need to ask ourselves questions about what we really believe. If we really want to change the game it starts with giving primacy to our children. Let them choose what and how and when and with whom they want to play.
After reading this article, I can reflect on this as I’m against specializing in a certain sport at a young age, I believe it is very important to diversify yourself and have fun when growing up. I believe most kids should play a certain sport for a majority of the time and focus on that, but then they need an off season where they take advantage of time relaxing but also taking advantage of other sports they enjoy playing. In the article it talks about sport specific training and which sports help reflect in the other, I think that is important but not necessary because I believe kids at a young age should play sports that they enjoy, not ones on which are forced onto them.
The prior section relates to young kids specializing in sports, and how I don’t believe it is appropriate at that age, but I do think there comes a certain point in their life when kids do need to focus mainly on one sport. With saying that it doesn’t mainly say leave those other sports completely but focus more on the other one. For example myself being a hockey player at age 17, I focus mainly on that with ice time reaching about 8 hours a week, and gym time usually 4-5 hours, this drains your body for the season, so therefore in the summer I take some time away from the game but I also still train 3 hours a week, while trying to stay in the gym daily. With all that I still have time to work and make money while in the summer I also golf 2-3 rounds a week, and play pick up soccer with friends. I do this so I’m not so worn out and it builds a better mental picture, mental clarity is a big part in sport because if you are not fully committed you will be worn down very quickly. With all this I still was able to play school sports such as golf, badminton, and tennis because those are sports I enjoyed playing and representing my school in.
With all this being said my point is basically that you shouldn’t specialize in a sport until an age where you know you are ready and when that is the sport you really enjoy playing. For myself this didn’t come until about age 15, before then I was playing upwards of 8 sports a year.
I believe that there is merit to all aspects of specialization. Forcing children as young as five to specialize in a sport, I believe is ridiculous. I am a firm believer that young children should be encouraged to play as many sports as possible but not forced to participate. I know from personal experience that playing a sport year round leads to burn out and lack of drive to participate. There should be no age at which a child decides to specialize. I think that as soon as the child is old enough to make their own decisions and express an interest in the sport they should be able to play it as much or as little as they would like. if a twelve year old, for example wants to play hockey all year and nothing else, they should be allowed. Mind you they should also be encouraged to try other sports at school or in the off season as a healthy reminder from their parents. Never should the sentence, “You can’t play because you are to young to specialize,” ever be mentioned. I find this study thought provoking how a college study can spark debates about specialization in young children. I understand that athletes need time to develop but most children are not going to be professionals in their respective sports and play for activity, social aspects and for their own enjoyment. This being said, children should get to choose how much they play and if they play multiple sports. Chances are a real athletic child will vary their choices and pick to play in many sport areas.
Looking at a different aspect that all children need to specialize at some point. They should specialize at the age required in order to succeed in the sport. I agree that in order to be a professional specialization needs to occur. Specialization should only occur if the child is going to attempt to play professionally. Even with the specialization into a sport there are many different platforms where other sports can still be played at a recreational level. For example, I am a competitive curler, that is provincially, nationally and internationally ranked, so that is my main focus. But on other platforms like high school and during the off season, there is time to get a change in sports and play volleyball, badminton and baseball. Even in those sports you can play at a competitive level. Its all about time management. As long as those sports are not high risk or something that would jeopardize the future of the sport the athlete specialized in.
I would agree with the accuracy of this article. It brings up the flaws in our youth sporting agencies where the focus seems to be on everyone making the big leagues and pushing athletes to be one dimensional. Most athletes require variation and should play more than one sport in order to enhance other skills and formulate different viewpoints. It ultimately should be up to the athlete, their commitment level and what they enjoy. No child should be playing a sport they feel forced to play or have no motivation to succeed in.
A down side to early specialization which I did t see mentioned is it’s impact on non-specialized kids. By the time my son had warmed up to trying soccer he was 10 and “too old” to join the neighbourhood league. To have him play at his level meant going in with much younger kids and he wasn’t keen on that, if they did allow it. In swimming lessons he was usually the oldest in his class (as was his sister in hers). Luckily it doesn’t matter as much in swimming and not at all in taekwondo (where they both shine). I agree that an all rounded athletic kid is great, but how can they enter into sports where the other kids have had years of experience?
Jan, in the case of soccer there should be a recreational league accepting all level of skills and allowing participation regarding the experience level. Club level is a different thing since there are try outs, but if your son has interest he should be able to play, I do not know why you said that he was too old. He may has less skills than the other kids but he should be able to have fun,learn and improve his game in the process.
My answer, based on a lifetime of experience (I’m 69) is you don’t. I grew up in an era where all the “Little League/Farm League” baseball team coaches had try outs. If you were good, you were allowed to join the team. If you were not, “Coach” told you to go home and practice and come back next year. Same with the “Pee Wee” football teams. Coaches wanted winning teams because the parents
demanded it. There was no toleration for losers. You had better come to try-outs with a through knowledge of the game rules and a desire to hone the skills you brought to the try-outs. I was an only child with no close relatives my age. We lived in a low-rent neighborhood of retired cotton mill workers that spent their days in a metal chair with an oxygen bottle. IOW, no kids. I came along late in their lives, and both parents really did not like each other. Dad worked out of town, Mom was going back to college to be a teacher. I came home to a list of chores and lots of tomato soup and grilled cheese. IOW, no athletics in my life whatsoever. Even at the elementary level, everyone was almost semi-pro at baseball, hoops, and football. There was no time for anyone still with “training wheels” so to speak. By the time I got to Jr. High, everyone was a polished Pro, and by the time of High school, they were Superstars. At PE time, they did not tolerate me “ in their game screwing everybody up” even if “Coach” ordered them to choose me. Usually, it ended up with me on a bench with something bleeding and “Coach” ranting at me that I had to toughen up. High school had a state championship (American) football team, and there was no other God but that. That “PE Coach” was the basketball team coach, and he came out with 6 basketballs under his arms, shouting “Shirts and Skins, choose up!”. He sat on the sidelines with a legal pad and “graded you”. After the first 6 weeks, I was summoned and told I’d better shape up or I’d flunk. I protested I simply had never played any sport. I was told that he knew a lie when he heard it, and his statement stayed. Finally, he asked one of the basketball players to “see what is wrong”. He stayed with me for a few minutes and had me do some moves. “Coach” summoned me again. I was told of I dressed out every day and ran around the football field, he’d (reluctantly) grant me a “D” in PE. Plus, I was told he’d keep a close eye on me from then on. (No, I’m not Gay, but the message was pretty clear. It was also clear to about everybody else, too. ) High School was a worse Hell than combat. Point is, either you bring it with you and hone your abilities, or you’re a pariah and you better get used to it. To this day, I still despise anything connected to Team Sports. Thank God it’s different now, and my own kids had choices I never had.
TO: Bill From Alabama,
I don’t doubt you for one second. I am sorry you had to put up with such terrible adulting in school. The coach you speak of had no right or sense to be showing any kids or teaching any kids anything. He was not interested in what was good for the children. Trust me they are still there too. Doing it in dif ways , but plenty are out there and the kids well being is not why they are there. I am glad they did not get to you and make you believe n the way they do. Not everyone is a good person . There are some (not many I know from my experience) that truly want to help children, they are few and far between.
I’m sorry. While I agree that this is the case in many sports, soccer (in addition to many other sports) is an exception. You picture is highlighting one coach’s recruiting program. And the NCAA stats are relatively aligned with his numbers for football. However, not all sports are nearly the opposite.
Football is based on athleticism. It is based on size, strength, agility and speed. The primary psychomotor skills are translate-able with other sports. In fact, there are many who play in college who never played the sport until they were in HS. However, soccer is a unique sport. It is also about agility and speed (for the most part), but the primary psychomotor skills in soccer are extremely unique. In no other sport are you required to manipulate a ball (other than basically kicking it) like soccer. The touch required to control a ball takes thousands of hours to develop. Juan above is absolutely correct. It’s not to say that there aren’t multi-sport athletes that play college (or pro soccer), but the NCAA reports that 68% of DI men’s soccer players and 62% of DI women’s soccer players were one-sport soccer athletes by 12. Conversely, to your point, the NCAA, reports 71% of DI men’s football players were multisport athletes, 88% of DI men and 83% of DI women who play lacrosse also played other sports, 87% of DI female runners and 91% of DI male runners were multisport athletes. Those numbers tell a very important story.
The truth is that we, in the US, are ignorant of the level of commitment required to build elite soccer players. Yes, our women dominate the sport. But our men struggle to even come close to compete on the world stage. Clearly our model isn’t working. Forget the fact that we didn’t qualify for the World Cup. Do a search for the top 100 mens soccer players in the world. Depending on which list you see, we may be lucky to be represented by 1 player, Christian Pulisic. Given the sheer volume of youth players at any given time playing soccer in the US compared to any other nation in the world, and that is a disgrace.
I whole-heartedly agree that multi-sport participation needs to be pushed at younger ages. At younger ages, every thing is about deliberate play where young athletes are just focused on playing and having fun. Learning the sport is less important than simply learning fitness, teamwork, and sports in general. However, at some point, to become an elite athlete in soccer, there must be a commitment to deliberate practice. For some athletes, they can do this as well as other sports. In fact, in 42 states, HS soccer is played in the fall, so many soccer players will run track in the spring and are quite gifted. In the other 8 states, cross country is the sport that most soccer players commit too. But most athletes start to specialize earlier in soccer, due to the demands to keep up with their peers developing their technical skills and tactical understanding of the game.
The bottomline is that the multi-sport solution is not the “end all, be all” for all sports and it’s not necessarily correct for all athletes. You make good points – all of which need to made. And parents need to understand all the facts. But when to specialize is not remotely settled for any sport. Every situation is different. Every athlete is different. And as I pointed out, for soccer, specialization (according to the NCAA D1 stats) is primarily taking place around 12-13 years of age.
A very intelligent response. All sports are different and to compare Soccer and Football is silly to think the development is the same. Think of Soccer as learning a new language. The younger you start and the more time spent practicing the better you get. Overuse injury is more to do with too much competitive game exposure and poor planning. By all means parents have your kids play whatever sports you think is wise but dont think of soccer as a part time sport and expect to play at the top level. Look at the best nation per capita which is Uruguay and ask Luis Suarez how old he was when he started specializing and which other sports he played when he was a kid.
Read yohan crueyff you are wrong about soccer specialization. It’s why America is so bad at soccer. Too much specialization.
I am 53, played HS soccer back in the day, have coached my kids in the local soccer league, and still play competitive pick-up soccer with men from all over the world. My whole life I have been hearing about how American soccer was about to take off and truly compete with the big boys on the International stage. Sorry, ain’t going to happen. IMO American soccer will never compete because of the way that it has been positioned as a sport in this country. The top tier level athletically talented kids and their parents perceive soccer as soft – which is exactly how the American youth soccer clubs have marketed it as – a “safe” sport that soccer moms don’t have to fret about. There is no glory or prestige to that. Also, year-round soccer that benefits the pocketbooks of the clubs discourages the top-level multi-sport athletes from even trying soccer. Therefore, even though we have a huge population advantage, America is pooling from 2nd tier level talent while most of the rest of the world – where soccer is actually perceived as a red-blooded masculine sport – pulls from their 1st level talent . Athleticism matters and makes the difference.
Thanks a lot for sharing this informative article.
It does make perfect sense that if you want to excel in one sport, that you should try and be good at others. That way, they can play off each other and overall, you’ll get better in all of them. I do agree with you that youth sports should encourage multi-sport participation. I’m sure that if more places did that, you’d have a lot of people breaking records left and right!
I am from Southamerica where soccer is the king. I am very surprised with the multi sport model of US applied to soccer development. In most of the world kids play soccer since they are 3 years old and are obsessed about it. Those that made it pro, only played soccer since they started walking. How would you explain then that when going at the international level in soccer the multi sport model fails in comparison with the only soccer model. Thanks!
There’s nothing to explain. Gareth Bale did athletics, field hockey, and rugby alongside soccer as a kid. Does he fail at the international level? Several English players were standout cricket players in their youth. Sweden’s Ibrahimovic was great in martial arts (largely accounting for some of his incredible bicycle kick and scissor kick goals in soccer). In the women’s game, Christine Sinclair and Abby Wambach played multiple sports in childhood. However, you make a good point that is becoming clear to many in the soccer world: soccer is starting to be identified as an “early introduction” sport — which basically means you will go further in the game if you are introduced to the sport early (obviously, only if you like it) and therefore start developing skills early. HOWEVER … this doesn’t mean that soccer players don’t benefit from playing other sports at the same time. Lots of today’s top professional players were and are multi-sport athletes.
Jim, thanks for your reply. I agree with you that soccer players would benefit from playing other sports. You are mentioning specific examples of top soccer players that did other sports and were successful. This article here basically says that most elite athletes were multi-sport athletes. My point is that it may be true in US, but when you go to the international level and specifically in soccer, that is not the case. Look just into the national soccer teams of Brazil and Argentina and I can assure you that at least 95% of the players grew up playing only soccer. Let me also give you a few examples of “only soccer” player, Maradona, Messi, Aguero, Neymar and Pele. In countries like Argentina and Brazil, early specialization in soccer is not new, it was always the norm. If the multi sport model for soccer players development would be successful, US should have more world cups than Brazil.
Yes in soccer there are a few examples of people that played multiple sports but let me tell you it is not common among the top 100. The most talented players in the world generally come from S America and they play nothing else. Soccer development is a frequency thing simple as that. Keep the kids from focusing on soccer and the us will never get anywhere at soccer. The whole argument that the women do great is only because the rest of the world have only recently started playing women’s soccer. I predict the USA women will never win a world cup again. Just watch
While I firmly believe that multi-sport is the best approach to youth development, I have to admit that there is an extremely basic but very common, statistical error that is being used to make the argument. In the above image, 42/47 high level athletes in North America were multi sport athletes (89%). The poster here is saying that virtually 100% of professional soccer players from South America are single sport athletes. These numbers are useless and tell us nothing unless we have something to compare them to.
For example, in North America, most children play multiple sports. If 95% of children in North America are multi sport athletes and only 89% of the professional ranks are comprised of them, that is an argument against the multi sport model. Taking the odds ration here with these numbers would suggest that you are 10% more likely to be professional with a single sport model. That is just an example numbers, we don’t know what the true background numbers are because they are not presented and therefore this 42/47 is completely useless information.
Juan you are talking about kids living in third world countries where the resources of parents automatically decide the kid is a one sport athlete. All you need is a soccer ball to play. Hell you could play barefoot if you wanted. Secondly the climate in many of these countries isn’t diverse like it is in North America.
I’m from Canada. Hockey is the sport. But we also play lots of baseball, soccer, lacrosse, downhill skiing, golf, tennis, football and competitive swimming and that’s just some of the options. I can’t be sure but I suspect just out of the sports I mentioned most kids where you live have never even be given the chance to experience anything other than soccer. Maybe baseball?? Hockey at age 5 will cost a family $1000 for a 5-6 month season. If a child starts showing natural talent and starts getting into leagues where equal talent competes, it’s a 5k-7K cost for a season of play. Parents in North America have financial resources to put their kids in whatever sports they want. Money is not an issue for many.
I am actually from Argentina, currently living in US, when I grew up there were multiple option for sports, actually I was a rugby player and not a soccer player (even everybody plays soccer, at least socially). We lived in a soccer culture country where most kids only care about soccer. Those that made it to be professional players only breath soccer since they are very little and do not care about anything else. It is not about lack of options but is about the passion of an entire country for the game. Soccer is more than a sport and is not about pure athleticism. The “American model” for soccer development basically focus on the most athletic kids, those that can run fast and through brute force make it to the other goal (I know that because I am assistant coach in my son’s team), when actually the best soccer player is the one that with a single touch can deliver a ball to a team-mate 30 yards away to score. You cannot teach that by a drill, kids learn all that by being immersed in the soccer culture and watching thousands of games and dedicating yourself completely to all the aspects of the game. It will never be learned by playing baseball, American football or swimming. As an assistant soccer coach I see all those multi sport kids going from baseball practice to lacrosse practice, then to soccer practice and to three games on the weekend and there is no study that could tell me that is healthier than playing only soccer, practicing two times per week and one game over the weekend. Yes, I can see that those guys are super fast with incredible endurance, but they really understand the game and know how to really play soccer? The rest of the world but a few countries understand the game like this. This is what you will have to face at the international level if you want to compete.
this is Fifa propaganda. Fifa wants your kid 24/7. Read how they find the wealthiest communities in non soccer countries and convince the wealthy to specialize. It’s how soccer plans to expand.
Great Blog..Thanks for Sharing
Actually this is true for gymnastics too. It does not require early specialization, but just attracts younger kids. I know elite gymnasts who started in college and I myself am an elite gymnast who started in high school. We may not be olympians, but we compete internationally, and are pretty f*cking good.
While I think it’s fantastic that people are able to and feel comfortable beginning gymnastics in later years, an ELITE gymnast competes at the senior international level, and I strongly doubt anyone who starts in after 12 yo has any chance of achieving that level by their peak age.
Good article. I was a multi-sport athlete in high school. I was an All-District, All-Conference, All-Metro tennis honoree. I was also Academic All-State Basketball. It helped me get a full ride to a university. I played tennis in college.
In high school, I had a very driven basketball coach, who actually was my elementary school PE teacher, too. He put a basketball in my hands when I was 5. By the time we were in high school, he expected us to play basketball 10 months a year. If I wouldn’t have played tennis, I would have been urged to play basketball 12 months a year.
By the end of my high school senior year, all but one other senior had quit the team. I only stayed on because there would have been a deep chasm in the ‘bench’ if I’d left, and we’d won our District Championships for 13 years in a row. I didn’t want to be the reason we lost District. [We won District.] I went to a high school with a student body of about 2500, so it wasn’t a small school.
Here’s the rub: I think coaches, even at the high school level, are paid more money if they win their District, their Regional, and their Sectional tournaments, and then make it to the final 4 at State. So, I don’t know that this phenomenon of one sport-tracking will stop as long as the high school coaches are paid more to win. They aren’t paid well anyway, so more money is definitively an incentive. These coaches tell parents that if the kids don’t play almost year round and summer ‘ball’ that we won’t have as good of chance of making the team or being on the starting team.
Although, actually, the summer leagues were fun, because a volunteer coach (my dad) coached, and everyone got to play. The university that hosted summer leagues *refused* to allow any regular high school coaches to coach summer ball, which I think was very wise. After all that, the high school coach still played who he wanted anyway.
I had fun playing tennis in college. Two of the other girls on my high school basketball team, who went on to play college basketball, HATED college ball. They viewed it as a JOB, because they couldn’t afford college if they didn’t have their athletic scholarship. [I’m 49 years old, so I know things have changed a bit as far as student loans, although maybe not in a good way or that much, considering high interest rates.]
If I would recommend anything to parents, other adults, teens, and children reading this, it would be to pick another sport in addition to your main sport that is a “lifetime” sport, such as golf, tennis, swimming, etc. You don’t have to be the best at both or all sports. But you become more well-rounded, make more friends, and have a good psychological break. I play mostly doubles tennis now, but it’s still fun.
Even though I’m active, I don’t play full-court basketball anymore. I guess I could play half-court, but it’s harder to find player than in tennis. I could shoot around I guess, but I’d rather play tennis. I know of men who have heart attacks on the basketball court from over-exerting themselves when they are older. I don’t think that happens as much with lifetime sports.
I’ve read a lot of research about how adults who stay fit later in life are the ones who usually play or participate in a lifetime sport.
A lifetime sport is a good mental break from another sport, if the other sport is more serious and strenuous. I find lifetime sports to be very social now. At my last job, I joined a mixed doubles league and those other players became good friends. Fitness and friendship! Sounds great.
Oh, and I ended up winning awards for playing tennis in college, too. When I played intramural basketball in college with the guys, everyone thought I should be playing college basketball, but I say, “No way.” I was still too burned out, very mentally, from playing under a “win at all costs” high school coach.
Take care! Good article.
In my opinion, it is important that children take part in several sports. Even more importantly, I think that they start early enough. Of course, they first learn sports through the game. Starting serious training too early doesn’t pay off.
Sport is also important for the development of personality. The acquired characteristics can be used in other areas of life. In my blog article (http://inventorstory.com/training-pays-off/) I have described what specific personality traits I gained during the training of various sports.
I completely Agree, Multisport is the way to go at least until high school. We strongly recommend our “Primary” basketball players play Soccer or Football in the fall/ spring, and Leave summer open camps or whatever they want to do.
So when most read ” Play Multi-Sports” I believe they uhndersand that as meaning play a sport every season, when its in season. For example, I recommend (again primary focus basketball players) Basketball in WINTER, Baseball in Spring, Summer Open, Soccer in FALL. Where most of out kids play travel AAU basketball in Summer, but some play soccer or baseball..whatever they want. Plus Summer camps etc.
The ISSUE now is not convining Parents to be Multi-Sport, everyone is doing that. The issue is they are trying to do Multi-Sport at the same time all year round.
Example. Primary Basketball Focus Kid will play Basketball (Year Round) but will ALSO play all the regular in season Sports. So there basically playing 2 sports at the same time all year long.\\
We need to educate our parents on how this is not the definition of Multi-Sport.
Absolutely pro muliti sports in this house. always have been. number 1 it keeps kids active which above and beyond all is top priority. It also keeps my kids focused and they meet friends and learn accountability towards their team. These are the reasons I put them in sports. If they become a top athlete that will be amazing. if they just develop love for fitness and a healthy lifestyle then that is just as amazing. my daughter now 8 has done dance gymnastics cheer and parkour and is now moving into lacrosse and basketball as she is huge on being in things her brother is in. that being said. she has done very well as a first time player in both sports with no background in them at all but her coaches both credited it to her flexibility, coordination and muscle memory that she developed early on with her previous activities. they said that if you know how to move your body then half the work is already done and the rest is just practice. my 10 year old son has done parkour bmx racing gymnastics basketball lacrosse and is now adding football in this year as hes loving being on a team and his coach specifically told them at the end of lacrosse season to take the season off and play other sports. get involved. we do have a winter lacrosse skills building camp that he will also be in and although his prime focus is on lacrosse he had came home and told me mom i need to go back into basketball this year cause coach says it will help me be better in lacrosse. that coach was amazing. also every kid on the team he plays for that is out there shining you can bet plays another sport. you can see them on the field in any sport from a mile away. they always dominate even at the novice level. That is why i have always been pro multi activities. cause you can see at 10 years old how much further it takes their games. and during the summer months we take a break. they do summer training camps here and there but for the most part its their off time to just enjoy before back to the grind. i find that it does a world of good to help stop the burn out. but we are still very physically active in the summer. summer has always been there time to dirtbike wakeboard waterski tubing camping fishing and swimming. and with all of that we are jam packed for the 2 months off and then good ol september it starts all over again. Cudos to all the families out there that take every waking minute of downtime they got to run back and forth from sport to sport. i know your pain as it really never seems to end but one day our kids will thank us for it.
whats cool about kids is that if you leave them alone without any adult supervision and a barrel full of sports equipment, it will all be on the ground every day with the kids designing the motions themselves rather than an adult. this proves to be very instructive and intuitive as the multi faceted motions of the body come to youngsters via inspiration and sometime by accident. Watching their peers and others helps as well. Sports are natural and the free play is the best. Too much parental coach control ruins much of what sport is about…….free play
Definition of multi-sport and not all coaches on board. I have 2 girls currently age 9 & 10 who have been multi-sport alyhletws since age 4. There are medals all over the house – soccer, skiing, hockey, baseball, and figure skating. Podium and rep teams all. And, there are still dance classes – hip hop, jazz, and musical theatre. However, being able to swing a bat and maybe hit the ball once in a while and same with every sport one is involved does not make one a multi-sport athlete? There will one day be an Olympic event “multi-sport” similar to triathlon therefore, a clear definition perhaps needs to be made. Moreover, coaches of other sports need to recognize true multi-sport athletes and the demands on time required. Especially if it is a “TEAM” sport. Some coaches adamantly require the athlete to be, for example, at every practice and game to stay on the rep team. My girls are at a high level at all their sports and at their age. My job is to keep the doors open so that when THEY choose, not me choose or a coach chooses, then my girls are good to go. Recognizing true multi-sports athletes by definition needs to be made by top sports organizations and filtered down to the bottom so that these athletes could pursue THEIR dreams be in the Olympics as a multi-sport athlete or otherwise.
You’re not wrong, Phil. While many of the national sport organizations now promote multi-sport participation, the philosophy that participating in multiple activities benefits all kids — whether they are future elite athletes or not — has not yet trickled down to all levels of the grass roots. But slowly, as parents like yourself ensure that children have many opportunities and sport governing bodies continue to promote the benefits of multi-sport, the message is spreading.
As for the definition, we think it’s pretty clear, and you’ve provided it in your comment: “soccer, skiing, hockey, baseball, and figure skating. Podium and rep teams all. And, there are still dance classes – hip hop, jazz, and musical theatre.”
If I died and came back as a bug, bird or some other form of life, guess where I’d like to be.
You guessed it. Very near a Badminton court w/ o getting hurt. I can tell you that as a spectator my best seat was behind the court watching the elite players going all out. The blistering foot speed, racket power combined with the soft touch shots such as drops. It takes wizard like uncanny skill to change pace like that and hit the spot every time. Needless to say that these are among the fittest athletes in any sport. They possess virtually limitless stamina, durability, flexibility and mental tenacity. The sheer physical strength and dexterity is hard to define.
Anyone that watches each point transition to the next, comes away in disbelief and admiration.
It’s intensity is pretty much unmatched. That’s all. This is where the buck stops. It is claimed that two days a week of competitive play can increase your life expectancy by at least two years. Yes, the quality of life is also enhanced to where you are both physically and mentally more vibrant if you so engage.
So I have a 14 y/o boy that has been fencing for @ 5 years. Every coach and athlete I talk to really hammers down on training and competitions if you want to be at the top. The sport focuses mostly on the back leg for lunging. With the time constraints placed on student athletes do you have any suggestions in how to incorporate a new sport while maintaining a lifestyle balance and the intensive instruction. I’m thinking basketball for hand speed and agility. Trying to look into books as well if you have any recommendations there. Thank you for your time.
Ben, hi! Have you read my post here? Listen, get your son some good badminton coaching and more importantly some competitive playing time. If for some reason he doesn’t warm up to it then just the repetitive and varied motion as well as the lunges and footwork in this sport will get him tuned up for fencing/foil to a great degree.
One of the best ballerinas in the country (Misty Copeland) apparently did not start studying ballet until age 13. I don’t know if she had any other dance training, but this might suggest that overall athleticism allowed her to take up dance late and become the highly accomplished dancer that she is today.
Misty Copeland’s story is very intriguing as she completely contradicts conventional wisdom about ballet dancers needing to start early (e.g age 4 or 5) and then spend thousands of hours in specialized ballet-specific training before puberty. Having said that, she was apparently “dancing” on her own to popular music (e.g. Mariah Carey) prior to age 13, and this was likely critical to her early development of rhythm, balance, and coordination (i.e. all-round athleticism, as you say). I am inclined to read her autobiography “Life in Motion” to learn more about her. Have you seen the television ad that she did for Under Armour? A beautiful statement about girls not giving up — Misty received several rejections from ballet schools at age 13 because she was “too old” and had the “wrong body shape”. Check it out on Youtube. Again, to your point, she completely contradicts (and thereby disproves?) all of the conventional thinking about the development of ballet dancers — all-round athleticism seems to have prevailed in her case.
I am in favor of the multi-sport participation environment for youths of any age. I am not concerned with the costs, but I do have a bigger hurdle that I am wondering if others have had to tackle.
My daughter plays Ringette, and has done so, as her primary sport, since she was 6 (now in her 7th year). She loves it and is very passionate about it. She dabbled in other sports in the off season (ie soccer) when she was younger, but now refuses to play any other sport. We have been encouraging her to branch out, specifically now that she is in junior high and there are so many other sports to try. She would rather do no sport activity during the off season (although she does maintain her fitness level through other activities, including yoga, biking and inline skating) then try something new.
Any advice on how to translate the long term benefits of multi-sport to the words a tween will understand and change her perspective?
Thanks for the comment, Jamie. We always advocate letting the child take the initiative, so take her lead. If your daughter wants a break from formal sport programs during the off season, that’s okay. Especially if she’s staying active with yoga, biking, and inline skating. It’s not about formal sport programs, it’s about physical activities that give kids a break. So don’t think “multi-sport” as much as “multi-activity”.
If you want to introduce other sports — she may find that she really enjoys something she’d never considered — you can do this without going the program route, too. Go to the playground with a basketball and just shoot baskets for a while. Set up a badminton net in your back yard. Throw a beach ball around in the local swimming pool.
Blaine, I couldn’t agree with you more. Great perspective, not multi-sport necessarily but multi activity. One thing about badminton, I need to clarify with some people.
Regrettably as it stands now (today) most people’s perspective on badminton conjures up images of backyard badminton. Something I jokingly, if not snidely refer to as ‘goodminton’. We put the word ‘bad’ in Badmintton simply by taking it indoors with better equipment and play it competitively. It’s an Olympic sport rather than just a game and that distinction needs to be made very clearly, and made expeditiously.
Can someone comment on dancers? Early specialization or not? I know dance is considered an art but really it is about using the body just like you do in sport. It is just as taxing on the body and requires strength, endurance, and an incredible amount of technique. I would love to hear what the experts have today but I can never find information on it. Just on gymnasts and figure skaters:(
Great point — thanks for mentioning this. There is no question that dance is athletic. As you say, the strength, flexibility, endurance and technique required makes it athletic. In fact, many would argue that top-level professional dancers have greater athleticism than most professional athletes that you see wearing a jersey — certainly greater all-round athleticism. We are planning to present some new stories on dance here at Active for Life. Stay tuned. ;-)
Rebecca, we’re looking for more information on whether dance qualifies as an early specialization activity. Certainly, traditional dance instruction would suggest that it is, but we’re not aware of any longitudinal studies that actually prove this.
Certainly, children benefit from learning rhythm at an early age, but they can learn that by dancing for fun, which they can do at a young age.
The benefit of learning rhythm, in fun activities (not training 10 hours a week from the age of 5, and not by doing rote, repetitive movements), has been demonstrated in research.
Hope that helps.